Bank of Nova Scotia v Emile Elias & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Barbados |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Barbados) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Michael Blackburn v Liat (1974) Ltd
...be implied in a contract if it is necessary to do so: "The test of implication is necessity." per Sir Denys Williams CJ inBank of Nova Scotia v Emile Elias & Co Ltd. 46 WIR 33 quoting with approval Lord Scarman's judgment in the Privy Council case of Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd. v Liu Chong Hi......
-
Ruthlyn Small v Terry Small
...has a good defence which has a real prospect of success. The principles applicable have been set out by this Court in Bank of Nova Scotia v Emile Elias & Co. Ltd (1992) 46 WIR 33. We therefore bear those principles in mind.” 28 A similar approach was seen in the case of Smith v Medrington ......
-
Ministry of the Public Service Information and Broadcasting v Vincent Marcel
...Court cannot be called upon to imply such a term. Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10 applied; Bank of Nova Scotia v Emile Elias & Co Ltd (1992) 46 WIR 33 applied. 5. Vacation leave is not money. The respondent could not retire when he did and then several years......
-
Ministry of the Public Service Information and Broadcasting v Vincent Marcel
...Court cannot be called upon to imply such a term. Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10 applied; Bank of Nova Scotia v Emile Elias & Co Ltd (1992) 46 WIR 33 applied. 5. Vacation leave is not money. The respondent could not retire when he did and then several years......
Request a trial to view additional results