Dottin v Callendar and Callendar

JurisdictionBarbados
CourtSupreme Court
Year1964
Date1964

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Sydney Mcmillan (by His Attorney Andrea McMillan) Claimant v Julian Arrington Defendant [ECSC]
    • St Vincent
    • High Court (Saint Vincent)
    • 10 May 2007
    ... ... The cases of Hughes v Griffin and Another 1969 1 All E.R. 460 and Dott'm v Callendar 1964 8 WIR seem to indicate that the Statute of Limitation was not applicable to a licensee in ... ...
  • Yearwood v Yearwood
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • 2 December 1981
    ...dwellinghouse and that the Limitation and Prescription Act, Chapter 232 is therefore not applicable. He referred to the case of Dottin v. Callender and Callender reported at (1964) 8 W.I.R. 44 and at (1964) 8 W.I.R. 429. In that case the evidence clearly indicated that permission was expre......
  • Browne v Lovell et Al
    • Barbados
    • High Court (Barbados)
    • 20 September 1979
    ...would not run in her favour. In support of this counsel cites Cobb and Another against Layne [1952] 1 All E. R. 1199 and Dottin against Callender and Callender [1964] 8 W. I. R. 44. 7 On the other hand counsel for the defendant submits that in the presentation of his claim, the claimant has......