Phillips and Others v Boyce and Another
| Jurisdiction | Barbados |
| Date | 2006 |
| Year | 2006 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Barbados) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
- Sealy v First Caribbean National Bank (Barbados) Ltd
-
Sealy v First Caribbean International Bank (Barbados) Ltd
...proceedings. 64 This Court assessed damages for defamation in 2006: Arnold Phillips et al v. Maria Boyce and P.S.M.T. (Barbados) Inc. (2006) 71 W.I.R. 14. In that case, the appellant was defamed by the first respondent in a staff meeting of the second respondent. The defamatory statement im......
-
Farrington v Higgs and Port & Starboard Ltd (t/a The Green Parrot Restaurant)
...13 August 2007. I attach at Tab 7 a copy of the said emails of 12 and 13 August 2007.” 67 (67) In Philips and Others v. Boyce and A nor [2006] 71 WIR 14 Simmons, C.J. commented on the meaning of malice – “Conventionally, malice in law connotes some spite, ill will or improper motive on the......
-
Marshall v Nation Publishing Company Ltd
...their disappointment in him because of the defamatory article. 53 In the case of Philips et al v Boyce and P.S.M.T (Barbados) Inc. (2006) 71 W.I.R. 14, this Court awarded damages of $10,000.00 where the defamatory statement stated in a staff meeting implied that the plaintiffs were dismisse......