R v Doyle
| Jurisdiction | Barbados |
| Date | 2010 |
| Year | 2010 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Barbados) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Alexander v the Queen
...the court. The effect of previous convictions is governed by section 40 of the Penal System Reform Act, Cap. 139 which was discussed in R. v. Hurley, DPP's Reference No. 2 of 2010, unreported decision of 8 July 2011 at paragraph [73] to [76]. The previous conviction in this case could prope......
-
Sealy v The Queen
...assault for the greater offence of rape may be found in R. v. Hodgson and Others [1973] 2 All ER 552 and Jippy Joel Doyle v. R. (2010) 79 WIR 59. 42 The power to replace the verdict of the jury with a verdict of a lesser offence is discretionary (see R. v. Peterson [1997] Crim. LR 339). In......
-
The Queen v Jason Callender
...alleged offence, and 7 years after the case was indicted. Counsel for the Defence alluded to this aspect briefly, citing Doyle v R [2010] 79 WIR 59. I am mindful of the case of Howard v R Cr. App 6 of 2003 as supporting the proposition that undue delay has a significant impact on sentence.......