Regina v Montila: coming full circle on marginal notes

AuthorBilika H. Simamra
PositionLegislative Counsel Cayman Islands
Pages260-268
REGINA v
MONTILA:
COMING FULL CIRCLE ON MARGINAL NOTES
BILIKA H. SIMAMRA*
In the recent case of Montila and
Ors
v Regina1 the House of
Lords
ruled
that marginal notes can be used in the interpretation of legislation. This article
deals with two main issues. First, it examines the extent to which this ruling
is likely, if at all, to influence attitudes of individuals involved in the drafting,
consideration and processing of legislation. Second, it points out the extent to
which the decision has re-opened a number of legal issues.
The Facts
In Montila and Ors, Counsel for the Crown submitted that it was well
settled that a side note or marginal note2 in an Act of Parliament did not
constitute a legitimate aid to the construction of the section to which it relates.
Counsel for the appellants conceded the point but the Court refused to accept
the concession. In an apparent departure from a number of previous cases, the
House of
Lords
held that a marginal note should not be excluded a priori.
The facts of the case were as follows. The appellants were each charged
with one count of converting the proceeds of drug trafficking, contrary
to section 49(2) (b) of the Drug Trafficking Act 1994, and one count of
converting the proceeds of criminal conduct, contrary to section 93C(2) of
the Criminal Justice Act 1988, offences commonly called money laundering.
The question was whether it was necessary for the Crown to prove that the
property being converted was in fact the proceeds, in the case of the 1994 Act,
of drug trafficking and, in the case of the 1988 Act, of
crime.
The argument
for the Crown was that, while it had to prove that the defendants knew or
had reasonable grounds to suspect that the property being converted was the
* Legislative Counsel Cayman Islands. The views expressed in this article are personal and must not be
attributed to the Government for which I work or any person, or entiry therein.
1 [2004] UKHL 50 (25 November 2004), accessed on www.bailij.org on 24 April 2005.
2 Since 2001, these notes are no longer in the margin or on the side. They appear now in bold as headings to
each section. For convenience we will use the term 'marginal note.'

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT