Scantlebury and Others v Attorney General and Another
| Jurisdiction | Barbados |
| Judgment Date | 2009 |
| Date | 2009 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Barbados) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Everton Tabannah v Worrell Latchman
...counsel cited a number of cases in support of his proposition. The first is Scantlebury and others v Attorney General of Barbados (2009) 76 WIR 86. The case was one in which the appellants were arrested and placed before the court for committal proceedings to take place with a view to their......
-
Everton Tabannah v Worrell Latchman and Another
...counsel cited a number of cases in support of his proposition. The first is Scantlebury and others v Attorney General of Barbados (2009) 76 WIR 86. The case was one in which the appellants were arrested and placed before the court for committal proceedings to take place with a view to their......
-
Michael Eugene Misick, v The Attorney General of the Turks and Caicos Islands
...motion. The defendants cite a line of authority that followed this line of reasoning: Scantlebury v Attorney General of Barbados [2009] 76 WIR 86; Jaroo v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago [2002] 1 AC 871; Berry v Director of Public Prosecutions and Another [1995] 48 W.I.R 193; In Harrikissoon v......
-
Knowles v The Attorney General; Leach v The Attorney General
...of Belize that extradition proceedings are sui generis. He cites Scantlebury and others v. The Attorney General of Barbados and others (2009) 76 WIR 86 where Simmons CJ (as he then was) opined: “These appeals are against a judgment of Reifer J in judicial review proceedings commenced under ......
Request a trial to view additional results