Scantlebury (Mormon) v R
| Jurisdiction | Barbados |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Barbados) |
| Judgment Date | 2005 |
| Year | 2005 |
| Date | 2005 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 cases
-
Ian Seepersad and Roodal Panchoo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
...review that question of the detainee's release at appropriate intervals. Reference was also made to the directions issued in Scantlebury (Mormon) v The Queen (unreported) 13 April 2005, (criminal appeal 34 of 2002), Barbados CA by Sir David Simmons CJ as a result of the Board's decision in ......
-
James Ricardo Alexander Fields v The State
...R v Sullivan [2022] SCC 19; R v Young BB 1985 CA 7 (CARILAW), (22 March 1985); Rambarran v R [2019] 5 LRC 431; Scantlebury v R (2005) 68 WIR 88 (BB CA); Seales v R BB 1997 CA 14 (CARILAW), (16 May 1997); Singularis Holdings Ltd v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd [2020] AC 1189; Vieira v W......
-
David Phillip v Joseph Phillip
...v Jacob [2009] UKPC 3 (LC); Phillip v Phillip (LC CA, 27 July 2023); R v Loxdale (1758) 1 Burr 445, 97 ER 394; Scantlebury v R (2005) 68 WIR 88 (BB CA); Sersland v St Matthews University School of Medicine Ltd [2022] CCJ 16 (AJ) BZ, (2022) 103 WIR 118; Smith v Selby [2017] CCJ 13 (AJ) (BB......
-
Marlon Campbell v R
...Cr App Rep 266 and Director of Public Prosecutions v Bailey [1993] UKPC 46. 48 Counsel additionally cited the cases of Scantlebury v R (2005) 68 WIR 88 and Wilbert Pryce v R [2019] JMCA Crim 40, both matters in which self-defence was held to have arisen on the evidence. Conversely, counsel......
Get Started for Free